[MD] The reification issue completely misunderstood

[MarshaV]

Mark,

In answering "Yup" I was responding to both the ease and 
difficulty of your question.  Sorry, if I gave you too much credit.  


Marsha 


 
 
On Jun 3, 2011, at 3:56 PM, MarshaV wrote:

> 
> 
> Yup...  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Jun 3, 2011, at 3:33 PM, 118 wrote:
> 
>> Hi Marsha,
>> Yes, and Buddha claimed to be a common man, first.
>> 
>> My question to you is: Taking out who you list below, who is left?
>> 
>> Mark
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> On Jun 3, 2011, at 10:18 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Jun 3, 2011, at 12:46 PM, david buchanan wrote:
>>> 
>>>> And yet Marsha says she hates reification and loves Bo. 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Marsha: 
>>> I neither hate reification, nor love Bo, as you state it.   I already stated:  Reification represents how the common man and many scientists, academics and even philosophers think.  It evolved as tool to facilitate some kind of betterness.  But it is flawed and of course the MoQ can help rectify the flaw.  
>>> 
>>> Well, actually, I love all, even you, can you believe it...    
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ___
> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html


 
___