[MD] The reification issue completely misunderstood

[Joseph Maurer]

On 6/5/11 7:26 AM, "118" <ununoctiums at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Marsha,
> 
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 9:56 PM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Jun 3, 2011, at 3:33 PM, 118 wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Marsha,
>>> Yes, and Buddha claimed to be a common man, first.
>>> 
>>> My question to you is: Taking out who you list below, who is left?
>>> 
>>> Mark
>>> 
> 
>> Hi Mark,
>> 
>> An answer:  There is some experience of being awake.
>> 
>> 
>> Marsha
>> 
> [Mark]
> Yes, Buddha was certainly "awake".  He help many others wake up during
> his lifetime.  I think that much of this is relegating static quality
> to the social level of words.
> Mark

Hi Mark,

I guess deaf mutes are forbidden the social level, and cannot be awake!

Joe



>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Jun 3, 2011, at 10:18 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Jun 3, 2011, at 12:46 PM, david buchanan wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> And yet Marsha says she hates reification and loves Bo.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Marsha:
>>>> I neither hate reification, nor love Bo, as you state it.   I already
>>>> stated:  Reification represents how the common man and many scientists,
>>>> academics and even philosophers think.  It evolved as tool to facilitate
>>>> some kind of betterness.  But it is flawed and of course the MoQ can help
>>>> rectify the flaw.
>>>> 
>>>> Well, actually, I love all, even you, can you believe it...
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ___
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> 
>> 
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html