[MD] The other side of Value

[Joseph Maurer]

Mark,

You are posting on a site that accepts a DQ/SQ formulation for reality.
It's alright to say that the MOQ is nonsensical, to provoke a further
discussion of QUALITY, but your metaphysics seems to be based on
mathematical logic, which places the value of Love on a balance scale.  You
are hamstrung by mathematics in describing reality as its logic does not
admit evolution, but only a lack of order in describing different
individuals.

Joe

On 6/6/11 4:28 PM, "118" <ununoctiums at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Joe,
> To define something as undefinable is a bit nonsensical.  Perhaps you mean to
> use the word "ineffable".
> 
> Just asking.
> 
> Mark
> 
> On Jun 5, 2011, at 8:15 PM, Joseph  Maurer <jhmau at comcast.net> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 6/5/11 10:51 AM, "Ham Priday" <hampday1 at verizon.net> wrote:
>> <snip>
>>> The novel 'in process' for each of us is our own life-experience.  Only when
>>> it is completed can we determine our essential value-complement.  And that
>>> is metaphysically significant because it's what we "take with us" from this
>>> dimensional existence.
>>> 
>>> At least, that's my belief.
>> <snip>
>> 
>> 
>> This may be true in a SO metaphysics, but in a DQ/SQ metaphysics there is
>> something indefinable.
>> 
>> Joe
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html