[MD] cloud of probability

[MarshaV]

Greetings again Dan,  

On Jun 9, 2011, at 1:35 AM, MarshaV wrote:

> 
> On Jun 8, 2011, at 11:55 PM, Dan Glover wrote:
> 
>> Hello everyone
>> 
>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 5:07 PM, david buchanan <dmbuchanan at hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Marsha said:
>>> ...at the moment, I think the best answer would be: all-that-is-opposite-from-non-gravitation, and I sometimes visualize the pattern as a cloud of probability.
>>> 
>>> dmb:
>>> 
>>> "Definitions are the FOUNDATION of reason. You can't reason without them." (Emphasis is Pirsig's. ZAMM, page 214.)
>>> 
>>> "A metaphysics must be divisible, definable and knowable, or there isn't any metaphysics." (Pirsig in Lila, page 64.)
>> 
>> Dan:
>> 
>> Exactly. Come on, Marsha and Mark. If you want to know what
>> gravitation is, look it up. Or even better, try reading ZMM... or
>> re-reading it, or whatever it takes to get the ideas contained there
>> to sink in.
>> 
>> Good God almighty...
>> 
>> Dan
> 
> 
> Hi Dan,
> 
> There are times when RMP uses words and concepts that go beyond the dictionary definition,
> and dictionaries differ,  for instance there are words in German that do not have an equivalent 
> in English.  

The culture of physicists might have a much broader understanding and definition of 'gravitation' 
than contained in a standard dictionary definition.  

There may be differences even between American and British definition of words.  
For an Buddhist culture, the definition for 'reification' means treating any functioning 
phenomenon as if it were a real, permanent 'thing, rather than an impermanent process, 
while it seems to be a more limited definition in an English dictionary.  
 
 
Marsha 
 
 
 
___