[MD] cloud of probability

[david buchanan]

Andre said to Marsha:
You asked how DQ/sq can be separated in 'any meaningful way'. Pirsig has done so and I provided some relevant sections from Anthony's PhD and referred you to LILA wherein this is discussed. You have not addressed this in your response. Instead you respond by asking an irrelevant and insinuating question.

dmb says:
Exactly. Marsha is disputing the MOQ's central distinction against overwhelming textual evidence, against logic, and in opposition to every english dictionary. In order to maintain her ridiculously contradictory definition of static patterns (as ever-changing clouds of probability), she has to ignore and/or misconstrue both of Pirsig's books, his 2005 summary of the MOQ, Ant's textbook and dissertation on the MOQ, the comments Pirsig added for Dan's book and even the texts she brings to the table. It's really quite astonishing and spectacular in its own way.