[MD] MOQ and Gödel's incompleteness theorems
MarshaV
valkyr at att.net
Thu Mar 10 04:05:11 PST 2011
Adire,
Have you made it your business to search out information about everyone
on this list? What have you discovered from my email address?
Marsha
On Mar 10, 2011, at 4:37 AM, ADRIE KINTZIGER wrote:
> Hate to inform you , Tuukka,and the other listers, that your machinery and
> the
> server your working on is heavely infected with virusses, bots,phising
> tools,
> social engineering tools,...etc, if i check your postings on the web under
>
> fi.virtap....etc, my antivirusshield pops up several times.
>
> The stanford link is solid to present,but if you present other links in the
> future,..
> Other listers are warned not to open them, without scanning for safety
> first.
>
> Yeah, the zolpidem photo, yes correct.
> Hm , i'm not going to post further on this item.I'm not heading for a
> defacement or something.
>
> ps, a line in one of your postings took my "attention",...this one
>
> 'It begs the question'
>
> quote from here.
> You seem to be claiming that pragmatists require a meta-system, which would
> dictate, which systems have a "true" notion of truth, and which systems have
> a "false" notion of truth. But if pragmatists did this, they would only be
> begging the question - for what is the notion of truth, that the meta-system
> uses, based on? On "working well"? What does that mean? That "true" notions
> of truth have Quality?
> ---------------------------------------
> what i mean to say by it,--it begs the question,this phrase is very well
> known here on the list,...its not the first time it is used
>
> greetzz, Adrie
___
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list