[MD] MOQ and G?del's incompleteness theorems

[118]

Hi Andre,
Sorry to confuse you with that below.  What I mean is that good and
evil are intuitive apprehensions which are then expressed with
rational thought.  First comes the awareness that something is good or
evil for us, then we turn (in our heads) to supporting that
rationally.  Things cannot be rationally good or evil, they always
boil down to an "emotional" understanding.  We cannot rationally
explain why killing is bad, for example.

Hope this makes more sense.

Mark

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Andre Broersen <andrebroersen at gmail.com> wrote:
> Mark to us Guys:
>
> Good and evil can be considered as emotional adjectives (just ask a sadist).
>  By emotional, I mean that they are imbued with Quality,which encompasses
> rational thought as a subset.
>
> Andre:
> Hi Mark, not sure if I follow all this. Let me untangle it as I seek
> clarification:
>
> Are you saying that good and evil are 'descriptions' of emotional (Quality)
> states which 'bring forth' rational thought?
>
> Confused.
> Andre
>
>
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>