[MD] MOQ and Gödel's incompleteness theorems

[John Carl]

 "not-very-serious" is my food and drink, Tuukka.  I am right handed, but I
kick left footed and I find my left hand has been much more valuable to me
over the years than my right, as I discovered when I accidentally severed a
small nerve in my left elbow which wiped out my medial nerve going to my
thumb and two forefingers.  I learned a lot about nerves through that
experience.  And the value of left hands to a guitar player (which does all
the tricky part) and a carpenter (which is because manipulation of the nails
is more delicate and important than the mere brute swinging of the hammer).

kirjoitti?  They have them varmints in your parts?

John

On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 1:00 AM, Tuukka Virtaperko <
mail at tuukkavirtaperko.net> wrote:

> <not-very-serious>
>
> You might already know this, but the hemispheres are cross-linked, so that
> the left one controls the right side of the body and the right one controls
> the left side of the body. This implies that all left-handers, including
> Pirsig, may be stronger on the hemisphere that is mentally able to control
> the other hemisphere. This, at least in my mind, assists any attempt to
> canonize Pirsig. But I'm actually in this for myself, because I'm
> left-handed too.
>
> </not-very-serious>
>
> -Tuukka
>
>
>
> 14.3.2011 6:31, John Carl kirjoitti:
>
>> Thanks Tuukka,
>>
>> I've been trailing that bait for months, but yours is the first real
>> "bite".
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Tuukka:
>>>
>>> I've heard that the right hemisphere of the brain is capable of treating
>>> the left hemisphere as an object, but the left is unable to do the same
>>> to
>>> the right. These are simplifications, and an expert of neuropsychology
>>> could
>>> be more clear about this. Wish we knew one!
>>>
>>>
>>>  John:
>>
>> I've never heard that aspect of it before, that the one hemisphere is
>> capable of objectification, but that's exactly the point I think is
>> pertinent.  What's important to consider, is that the right hemisphere
>> would
>> be equally incapable of objectification, if there wasn't a differing
>> aspect
>> of mentation to objectify.  Both are dependent then, upon differentiation
>> for full realization.
>>
>> Bingo!
>>
>> John
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>
>>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>