[MD] [Bulk] Re: empathy

[118]

On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 11:47 AM, david buchanan <dmbuchanan at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> dmb said to Mark:
> ...if there is any substance to your claim and you really can deny my position, then you'd be doing us all a favor if you dished it up. Then we'd have something like a legitimate dispute and that's what a real conversation should be like around here.
>
> Mark replied:
>
> ... I would have to say that the ball is in your court.
>
>
> dmb says:
> Yea, that's about what I figured. I'll take that to mean that you have no evidence and there is no substance to your claim.
> A claim made without reason or evidence can be dismissed without reason or evidence. A claim made with evidence and reason can be refuted with nothing less than better evidence and better reasons. But you've got neither. In fact, you haven't even identified any particular position or idea as the one in dispute and so your complaints are quite empty.

[Mark]
Well, dmb, this seems typical of your method for discussion.  If my
complaint is empty, then your response is emptiness within that.  So,
my claim stands until you prove otherwise.  Step up or shut up.




> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>