[MD] Paradox

[Arlo Bensinger]

[Dan]
I would issue a caution that Dynamic Quality cannot be understood in 
an intellectual sense. "It" comes before intellectualization. I 
understand you to say by "ever-changing" that Dynamic Quality is "not 
this, not that." And that's okay. But it should be stressed that 
change as we understand it is a static quality pattern, as is "not 
this, not that," and every "thing" we discuss. Otherwise, I fully agree.

[Arlo]
An excellent point, thank you. I typically use scare quotes when I 
mean to convey this, and I apologize at not making this idea 
stronger. So the difference between saying, DQ is ever-changing, and, 
DQ is "ever changing", is one that I see and mean, but should 
probably be more clear about. And that is precisely the point you make.