[MD] [Bulk] Re: desires

[MarshaV]

On Mar 21, 2011, at 7:43 PM, X Acto wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Mar 21, 2011, at 9:07 AM, Andre Broersen wrote:
> 
>> Andre:
>> In trying to defend yourself you're playing with words again Marsha...
> 
> 
> Marsha:
> And you're playing with a different set of words.
> 
> In my understanding, sq is not other than DQ(Quality), or put another way: 
> the patterned is not other than the unpatterned.      
> 
> 
> Ron:
> This truth should be at the root of all meaning, but when it becomes dogma
> it champions and glorifies meaningless-ness undercutting Pirsigs MoQ.
> 
> 

Marsha:

There is just as much dogma in insisting that it is as in insisting that it isn't; 
therefore, the answer is yes, no and all of the above.  



___