[MD] MOQ and Completeness Theories (Sorry, Godel.)

[ADRIE KINTZIGER]

Yeah, you'r right about that one.
But it is what you get if you keep studying the availiable material,in the
end
it's very difficult to come to another conclusion than Pirsig did.

I'm not trying to re-invent the wheel, only try to make some people
understand
how a wheel turns, why the spokes are there in the first place,and the hub.
Thx , dude.
Adrie

2011/3/24 Andre Broersen <andrebroersen at gmail.com>

> Adrie to Andre:
>
>
> Good,Good Good!!!!
> shit , why i'm not a better writer.
>
> Andre:
> Thank you Adrie. I was tossing up whether to put it in my own words or not
> but then thought the better of it. Like reinventing the wheel and it turns
> out square or triangular, perhaps a hexagonal but never the smooth circle.
> Anyway, I thought these quotes addressed the issue under discussion pretty
> neatly.
>
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>



-- 
parser