[MD] [Bulk] Re: desires (rename to The first division of theMOQ)

[Margaret Warren]

Ian/David
 ... as a definition of static. The difference between static and dynamic is
that static is something (a species technically) - a pattern - that persists
long enough to have humans  attach a name to its concept.

this also makes sense to me. 

It seems to me, as David suggested, that what Pirsig described in 
Lila is rather complete all on it's own...

I find it more interesting to look for areas in my own life,
personally, where I can apply MOQ type thinking - using the
philosophy rather than
arguing (statically) over the definitions. 

mm


-----Original Message-----
From: moq_discuss-bounces at lists.moqtalk.org
[mailto:moq_discuss-bounces at lists.moqtalk.org] On Behalf Of Ian Glendinning
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 4:58 AM
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Subject: Re: [MD] [Bulk] Re: desires (rename to The first division of
theMOQ)

Hi David, long time ...

Yes, completely agree,

In fact I tend to reverse your sentence ...
>
> If you are 'conceiving' of something, is that not some 'thing', therefore
some thing static?
>
 ... as a definition of static. The difference between static and dynamic is
that static is something (a species technically) - a pattern - that persists
long enough to have humans  attach a name to its concept.

Ian
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html