[MD] The first division of the MOQ.

[David Harding]

Hi Mary,

Thank-you. I have really been putting a lot of time and care into these posts to Mark on MD so I am glad to see they are appreciated.

Though I must say that I'm not new, just returned from a long hiatus and it's nice to be back.

-David.

On 27/03/2011, at 3:05 PM, Mary wrote:

> Hello David Harding,
> 
> Welcome to the forum! 
> 
> I have appreciation for your posts this past week and encourage you to
> continue.  
> We are all on a journey here.  Your voice is refreshing.
> 
> Many thanks,
> Mary
> 
> [David]
> The analogy 'shines through in the present moment' is fine for Dynamic
> Quality, but these analogies do not get at what Dynamic Quality is because
> that's not Dynamic Quality.  Even saying 'that's not Dynamic Quality' is not
> Dynamic Quality. 
> 
> It would be nice to think that somehow we can avoid static quality but we
> cannot. Every thing is static quality. That is *the* definition of static
> quality. 
> 
> When you call something Dynamic Quality you've just used a word. In fact
> your whole sentence (As one is calling it Dynamic Quality, it is a dynamic
> process without words) has created a you and a whole bunch of words
> describing Dynamic Quality. This is all static quality. It would be nice to
> think that we are somehow inextricably a 'part' of Dynamic Quality. Trick
> it, if it isn't watching, so that we can have Dynamic Quality for ourselves.
> But if you use that kind of thinking then you've turned Dynamic Quality into
> something very static. You cannot grasp Dynamic Quality. For the same reason
> Zen Masters call Zen useless Dynamic Quality is nothing! 
> 
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html