[MD] Why isn't the MOQ more popular

[MarshaV]

Come to the orchard in Spring.
There is light and wine, and sweethearts
 	          in the pomegranate flowers.
 
If you do not come, these do not matter.
If you do come, these do not matter.
    
         (Rumi)  





On May 6, 2011, at 4:22 PM, Leif Gunnar Alvær wrote:

> Hi.
> first post in a long long time..
> As far as I see it MOQ holds value as a metaphysics, or model of
> reality. It is no more true than the models we use today to explain
> reality, but they are also valuable. My question is simple, and it
> might have been discussed earlier in this mailing list, why isnt the
> MOQ popular? I mean, one PhD and a limited amount op people discussing
> this, is that all? I might be missing something here, but I would
> assume that the MOQ would eventually catch fire and spread. If it was
> of poor quality it would probably die out, but it does provide us with
> an alternative way of viewing the world, and all such alternatives
> should atleast be investigated by the universities and educational
> establisments (everyone who wants to evolve tbh).
> 
> So what am I missing
> 
> alvaer



 
___