[MD] Keep on ...

[MarshaV]

Mark,

Okay...   

I don't remember using my statements as a whip to beat you.  
These are merely words.  You definitely use a eclectic bunch 
of words.  You can always ignore mine.  


Marsha


On May 15, 2011, at 10:24 AM, 118 wrote:

> Hi,
> The purpose of MoQ (imo) is to provide awareness of the traps
> presented.  If the cage is seen as such, one can move beyond it.
> Reification, as you use it, is a tool.  We could consider the computer
> to be a cage, but many do not.  The separation you mention can be
> destroyed through MoQ.
> Mark
> 
> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 6:46 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> And in this reification process, it is that cage wall that creates separation between the phenomenon/concept and the self when an image, construct or definition is erected and assigned.  imho
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> To me this quote represents reification, where the cage of a definition excludes context, intuition and heart.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> RMP:
>>>> 
>>>> "... The definition is a cage...  You set limits on what a word is.  You set limits on what your experience is.  And those limits, which you set in order that you can manipulate these words, are also a cage for that word.  It can't go beyond it one way or another."
>>>> 
>>>>    ('The MOQ at Oxford', Part 4: The Church of Reason)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> 
>> 
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html


 
___