[MD] Keep on ...

[Andre Broersen]

dmb to Marsha:

The sun will come up tomorrow and the point of this post will be even further over Marsha's head.

Andre:
Right dmb (as usual). Marsha will point to the reification of the sun as used in your context and therefore not a real thing to be experienced. 'Tomorrow' will be another projection of your own static patterns and therefore laughed at (by Marsha). The point of your post will be rejected(!) as just your opinion. The grammar you use, which keeps your sentence together, will be regarded as just another expression of your SOM bias and therefore not befitting MOQ... as Marsha is a fond student of.

The whole excercise is a hopeless revelation of SOM because we use language. As matter of fact: the MOQ really is SOM (a la Platt and BO). It is a figment of our imagination to think otherwise.

It goes beyond the intellectual level because the intellectual level IS SOM. Pirsig has failed because he tried to bring the whole lot of philosophical history and their dilemmas/platypuses together, clarify this and in the process made lots of stuff redundant. He failed because he used language, retained 'subjects' and 'objects' ( fuck their re-definitions and re-conceptualizations) and generally stuffed up his own whole project starting promisingly with ZMM and then completely confusing and contradicting himself in LILA and Lila's Child.

Life IS one big prison. Life IS one big constraint. Wish I never lived it. Oh, calamity. What pity-full child I am.

Sad really, from all the 'many different perspectives' I look at it, my life IS constraint: DQ: constraint, sq: constraint. A cell, prison, cage, reified, mortified, certified!

She blewitt.