[MD] Keep on ...

[MarshaV]

Add:  What differentiates science as an intellectual pattern rather than a social pattern?  


On May 19, 2011, at 10:50 AM, MarshaV wrote:
> 
> 
> On May 19, 2011, at 10:26 AM, Andre Broersen wrote:
> 
>> Marsha to Andre:
>> 
>> And you do not see "impenetrable immune system to the exclusion of morals." a flaw, an imperfection?
>> 
>> Andre:
>> Nice try Marsha but you keep on confusing the pattern for the level which I think is what you are trying to get at. So many on this discuss have pointed this out to Bodvar over a period of fourteen odd years to no avail and you seem to continue it. The activity called 'science' is an intellectual pattern of value not to be confused with the level itself.
> 
> 
> Marsha:
> I am not Bo.  I have stated many times my approach is different than Bo's.   For me, the fourth level is comprised of a collection of static patterns of value that can be categorized as 'intellectual.'  'Science' is the name of a static pattern of value, not the pattern.   Why don't you described the pattern 'science'; describe how 'making science' functions as an activity.    
> 
> The rest of your response was not applicable.  It was mostly preachy filler.   
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html


 
___