[MD] Keep on duckin'

[MarshaV]

On May 23, 2011, at 11:23 AM, John Carl wrote:

> Hello Marsha,
> 
> Let's just cut to the chase here.  I think the key point I'm disputing with
> you is the same as I just posted to Andre - the distinction between knowing
> and defining.  Please feel free to address my arguments that I posted to
> him, and explain how RMP could write, "You can't define Quality but you KNOW
> what it is" if definability and knowability are inextricable.
> 
> Thanks Marsha,
> 
> John


Greetings John,

I'm sticking to my original statement:  DQ is non-dualistic.  DQ is indivisible, 
undefinable and unknowable; there is NO DIVISION, so there is no-thing to 
know and no one to know it.  It is static quality that seems known.  Which 
includes the sense of self.   

Who is this I/YOU that is defining and knowing?  It is a mental construct that 
exists conventionally, a static pattern that is applied to the flow of experience/
events.   


Marsha 

 
___