[MD] The other side of Value

[Joseph Maurer]

On 5/29/11 11:08 AM, "Ham Priday" <hampday1 at verizon.net> wrote:
<snip>
> I don't claim an ability to "describe" the ineffable, but simply to explain
> its "dynamics" in a context that logicians like you can accept.  It's
> obvious to me that although we can't experience "nothingness" in our world
> of appearances, it nevertheless accounts for the differentiation and
> contrariety of our experience.  Like the proverbial "zero" which
> mathematically represents "nothing", it doesn't exist; yet existence is not
> experienceable without it.  One could say that nothingness is conspicuous by
> its absence.
<snip>

Hi Ham and All,

Your word games are confusing.  You claim to have no ability to "describe
the ineffable", and then you clam it has "dynamics."  How could you know
such a thing?  Your description  of "nothingness", seems more like a
description of evolution as "differentiation" and "contrariety" in our
experience.  Word games!

IMHO evolution is a much clearer explanation of differentiation and
contrariety of experience.

Joe