[MD] Keep on duckin'
X Acto
xacto at rocketmail.com
Mon May 30 05:46:07 PDT 2011
Ron,
Why don't you explain how you understand the contradiction.
Marsha
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
Well, for starters, this quote tends to say it all...
"From a centrists perspective, ontological absolutism is based on the mental
distortion known as reification."
Meaning, that from a pragmatic point of view
" As theory is not purely determined by some intrinsic nature of
> reality, there is no one conceptual system that uniquely accounts for the
>myriad
>
> of natural phenomena"
you are taking a position of an ontological absolutism when you assert that the
mental
distortion known as reification IS the basis of all conception. This assertion
demands that
there is only one conceptual system that uniquely accounts for the myriad of
natural
phenomena contending that salvation from it is the subdueing or "killing" of it.
Wallace talks about reification as a "tendancy".
This is the difference I see between yours and Wallaces point of view regarding
reification.
-Ron
..........................................................................................
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list