[MD] The Hero's journey

[118]

Hi Dan,
In my opinion, it is the quality of the posts which comes first.  The rightness or wrongness comes through agreement.  I enjoy reading your posts even if I don't always understand them.

Cheers,

Mark

On Nov 16, 2011, at 10:09 PM, Dan Glover <daneglover at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello everyone
> 
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:55 PM, 118 <ununoctiums at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Dan,
>> I have to agree with you that often posts in response lack quality.  What I understood from Ron (which I believe he confirmed, I think) was that your conversation was getting very difficult to follow, and perhaps somewhat circular.  As far as I can tell, typically you hold your own with the armchair metaphysicians.  My training in formal philosophy is meager, but I must say that I have learned much from reading threads, and trying to contribute in my own spacey way
> 
> Dan:
> 
> I understand... I know my posts are difficult to follow... they're
> even more difficult to formulate and to write. I'm not a philosopher.
> I have no formal training. I'm probably wrong in most of what I say.
> And I appreciate the opportunity to discuss these issues with folk
> like Matt, dmb, Ham, Andre, Steve Peterson, you, and others. I learn
> much.
> 
> Ron has been around a long time and I expect better from him than to
> jump into a discussion without properly arguing a point. He attacked
> me with innuendo and slandered my post without saying why. And the
> only thing he confirmed was that he was being a dick. Apologies my
> arse...
> 
> If my contributions seem circular, they are. Many times I go back over
> certain areas to make a point both to others and to myself. I don't
> know how else to do it.
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Dan
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html