[MD] The Relativist's journey

[MarshaV]

dmb,  


Oh, your definition doesn't have a source.   Your definition of 'relativism' is whatever you think it is.  The issue is is whether truth (static patterns) is relative within the MoQ.  


Marsha 




On Nov 22, 2011, at 1:00 PM, david buchanan wrote:

> 
> Marsha shouted at dmb:
> PLEASE SUPPLY THE SOURCE FOR THE DEFINITION OF RELATIVISM (the one in the nutshell) YOU SUPPLIED:
> 
> 
> 
> dmb says (again):
> 
> I gave you the definition you asked for and I showed you exactly how and where Pirsig uses the word "relativism" in a way that fits that definition. Since the issue is whether or not Pirsig is a relativist, what could be more relevant and appropriate? If that's not good enough for you, then you're just not a reasonable person. Granger's description of Pirsig's relationship to the Sophists also supports this definition.
> 
> Why do you always pretend to want answers that you already have and don't really want anyway? It's boring. Go away. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 		 	   		  
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html


 
___