[MD] The Relativist's journey
MarshaV
valkyr at att.net
Wed Nov 23 09:17:11 PST 2011
On Nov 23, 2011, at 12:08 PM, Arlo Bensinger wrote:
> [Marsha]
> And I might think some are bending over backwards, due to a cultural and personal bias, to reject a term, in its epistemological connotation, that is in common use within an Eastern explanation . Including the term help establish the bridge between East and West. imho.
>
> [Arlo]
> If anything, you and DMB are having different conversations. He is using the term as it has meaning within the discourse of the historical philosophical conversation, and you are using the term as it has meaning to you, ignoring every connotation of the word that doesn't fit into your desire to link the MOQ with that term and selecting only those that do fit.
Marsha:
When you wrote 'historical philosophical conversation', weren't you limiting the statement to Western-centric historical philosophical conversation? I am interested in exploring the relationship between Buddhism and the MoQ.
___
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list