[MD] Labels and Ostracisms

[MarshaV]

Dependent on, relative to an individual's static pattern of life history... 


 
"The reason there is a difference between individual evaluations of quality
is that although Dynamic Quality is a constant, these static patterns are
different for everyone because each person has a different static pattern of
life history. Both the Dynamic Quality and the static patterns influence his
final judgment. That is why there is some uniformity among individual value
judgments but not complete uniformity."   
   (RMP, SODV)





On Nov 27, 2011, at 11:24 AM, X Acto wrote:

> Dont get me wrong it certainly would be ideal if everyone understood God as the good and we all
> valued similar types of good ,the best in intellectual good. but sadly this takes self reflection, something
> few have want to do.
>  
> ..
>  
>  
> 
> From: 118 <ununoctiums at gmail.com>
> To: "moq_discuss at moqtalk.org" <moq_discuss at moqtalk.org> 
> Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2011 11:05 AM
> Subject: Re: [MD] Labels and Ostracisms
> 
> Hi Ron,
> 
> Yes, I agree. There is no hypothetical entity.  We make the rules.
> 
> Sent laboriously from an iPhone,
> Mark
> 
> On Nov 27, 2011, at 7:47 AM, X Acto <xacto at rocketmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> Mark:
>> Can you imagine a place where you are given presents every day?  Where someone gives you rules with a twinkle in their eyes.  Where the order of the day is to Ho, Ho, Ho.  Can you imagine a place where it is Christmas every day?  Such a place does exist, and it is not as foreign as you may think.  In fact you could say it is not foreign at all.  Just drop your baggage you do not need it where you are going to be. 
>> 
>> Ron:
>> I think THAT is exactly the sort of baggage of reward/punishment that is placed in
>> a hypothetical entity that gives one rules that is the problem with God AND christmas in general.
>> When people start doing Santa's work of weeding out the naughty from the nice, when they are
>> disapointed in the presents they get are not the presents they asked for...gosh..it's not foriegn
>>   it's just an immature undeveloped selfish conception of the good.
>> 
>> On Nov 26, 2011, at 1:25 PM, X Acto <xacto at rocketmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I try to understand, that god IS "good" and in that way I can use the word.
>>> But
>>> That is usually not the typical conception
>>> 
>>> the typical conception is a kind of santa clause fantasy and the arguement
>>> lies in the meaning of the word in the common contextual way.
>>> 
>>> ..


 
___