[MD] E=mc2: maybe not

[MarshaV]

Hi Mark,

Nowhere did I state that "this physics stuff" is all Reality, and I understand 'analogy' full well.  With your statement "... Free Will is Real because it is Real."  I might wonder if you understand analogy.  -  Neither of us know directly why RMP was put into the hospital, but it might be safe to say it was not just trivial omelette-making.  And what does losing ones mind Really mean?  That's a question maybe you can answer.  -  Instead of theoretical physic, maybe I should have wished to study the philosophy of physics with a specialty in quantum metaphysics?  But to be honest, I think I should have studied communications.  


Marsha  




On Oct 1, 2011, at 11:33 PM, 118 wrote:

> Yes, the math is always being rewritten, as a MoQer this should not surprise you.  It is all sq being used to depict reality, and as such it is a creation of man.  Unless you understand what the word "analogy" means, you will not understand what MoQ is.  Reread the end of ZaMM.  Pisig lost his "mind" for a reason, it was not just trivial Logic.  He is trying to explain what happened to him.  If you buy all this physics stuff as Reality, then you need to reconsider your reason for liking MoQ, IMHO.
> 
> Mark
> 
> On Sep 29, 2011, at 7:48 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> NYT: 
>> 
>> 
>> The physics world is abuzz with news that a group of European physicists plans to announce Friday that it has clocked a burst of subatomic particles known as neutrinos breaking the cosmic speed limit — the speed of light — that was set by Albert Einstein in 1905.
>> 
>> If true, it is a result that would change the world. But that “if” is enormous.
>> 
>> Even before the European physicists had presented their results — in a paper that appeared on the physics Web site arXiv.org on Thursday night and in a seminar at CERN, the European Center for Nuclear Research, on Friday — a chorus of physicists had risen up on blogs and elsewhere arguing that it was way too soon to give up on Einstein and that there was probably some experimental error. Incredible claims require incredible evidence.
>> 
>> 
>> http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/23/science/23speed.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=neutrinos&st=cse
>> 
>> ___
>> 


 
___