[MD] Taking words Seriously

MarshaV valkyr at att.net
Sat Oct 15 06:46:15 PDT 2011


On Oct 15, 2011, at 4:04 AM, MarshaV wrote:
> Marsha:
> I do find comparing and contrasting different philosophers interesting, 
> and being able to present a point or refute a point very valuable. Such 
> presentations may possibly help clarify an important issue.  But that James 
> and Dewey and Pirsig use similar key concepts does not place them in the 
> same pigeonhole, or validate each other, or make them interchangeable.  
> There is a philosophy at hand.  It is the Metaphysics of Quality.   There may 
> be similar aspects between the MoQ and a great many other philosophies, 
> but it is also unique.  
> 
> I will dismiss your evaluations of RMP as a limited scholar, as well as your 
> evaluation of what is a 'bad argument'  because as presented they seem 
> just your opinion.  It brings to mind the differences between an artist and 
> an art critic.   
> 
> 
> 
> ___


Sorry, Matt, I forgot to properly close, and thank you for writing.    


Marsha 

 
___
 




More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list