[MD] Taking words Seriously
MarshaV
valkyr at att.net
Sat Oct 15 06:46:15 PDT 2011
On Oct 15, 2011, at 4:04 AM, MarshaV wrote:
> Marsha:
> I do find comparing and contrasting different philosophers interesting,
> and being able to present a point or refute a point very valuable. Such
> presentations may possibly help clarify an important issue. But that James
> and Dewey and Pirsig use similar key concepts does not place them in the
> same pigeonhole, or validate each other, or make them interchangeable.
> There is a philosophy at hand. It is the Metaphysics of Quality. There may
> be similar aspects between the MoQ and a great many other philosophies,
> but it is also unique.
>
> I will dismiss your evaluations of RMP as a limited scholar, as well as your
> evaluation of what is a 'bad argument' because as presented they seem
> just your opinion. It brings to mind the differences between an artist and
> an art critic.
>
>
>
> ___
Sorry, Matt, I forgot to properly close, and thank you for writing.
Marsha
___
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list