[MD] seeing

[MarshaV]

Hello Mark,

It may be that my language skills are not as stupendous as yours.  I am not comfortable with your adopted rambling type of 'automatic writing'; though you seem quite taken with your own style and content.  I will add something to the dialogue if it seems appropriate.  Meanwhile I will read your tributes to yourself with some continued curiosity.  


Marsha 

 
 
 

On Oct 26, 2011, at 12:57 AM, 118 wrote:

> My pleasure Marsha, it's called trying to have a discussion; i don't bite.  This method of sound bites you use reminds me of politics.  Did you ever think of running for office?   It is impersonal, so there is no way you will have to reveal your thoughts.  Not too scary there, and one can feel righteous.
> 
> Plagiarism works well in our modern world, so much to choose from, so little to have to come up with.  I promise to stop trying to get you out of your shell, and let you be.  Keep up your reading.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Mark
> 
> On Oct 25, 2011, at 2:14 PM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> No, Mark, but thanks for asking...    
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Oct 25, 2011, at 4:33 PM, 118 wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Marsha,
>>> OK.  I have to assume that those are your exact words.  What similarities do you see?  You can use a quote again if you can't express them in your own words. I am simply trying to understand your conception of Buddhism within the MoQ framework.
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> Mark
>>> 
>>> On Oct 25, 2011, at 10:19 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Mark, 
>>>> 
>>>> Here's why it is useful:   
>>>> 
>>>> "While I am thinking about it there is a very good book on Buddhism recently out called 'Buddhism, Plain and Simple', by Steve Hagen and published by Tuttle Publishing. I recommend you get it because it shows the similarities, between the MOQ and Zen Buddhism more clearly than any other I have seen."
>>>> 
>>>>  (Pirsig to McWatt, May 6th 1998)
>>>> 
>>>> Marsha
>>>> 
>>>> 


 
___