[MD] Protagoras: everything is relative...

[118]

Hi Marsha,

Whatever, at least I now understand your foundational premise.  I can now read your posts with that understanding.  Let me know if it changes...

Mark

On Oct 27, 2011, at 9:31 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:

> 
> 
> 
>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Oct 26, 2011, at 9:29 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Oct 26, 2011, at 12:05 PM, 118 wrote:
>>>>> ,
>>>>>>> Marsha:
>>>>>>> Where did I say that ALL knowledge was intellectual in nature???  I never made such a claim.  You must be the one confused.  
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Mark:
>>>>>> It was in the quotes you provided.  Perhaps you want to reconsider?
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Marsha:
>>>>> Provide the quotes!!!  I have never stated that all knowledge was from the intellectual level.   
>>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Oct 27, 2011, at 1:13 AM, 118 wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Mark:
>>>> I may be mistaken, but those quotes you provide say many things.  It was the one which broke a car up into a set of seats.  Are you saying that that author was incorrect with his analogy?  If so, you should qualify the quotes you provide, otherwise I have to assume they are speaking for you.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Marsha:
>>> Provide my email with the quote!!!    
>>> 
>>> 
> 
>> Mark:
>> You know exactly what I am referring to.
>> 
>> But, now I know that when you speak of "knowledge" you are not referring to the intellectual variety.  I am glad we cleared this up, your use of quotes can be misleading, and sometimes I do not understand what point you are trying to make since you provide no explanation.
>> 
>> The James's quote refers to the conceptual variety.  If you see this differently, let me know.  And no, I do not have to remind you of what you posted by reading back to you your post.
>> 
>> 
> 
> Hi Mark,
> 
> Baloney!  
> 
> The quote is quite clear.  The James quote states "all knowledge" NOT "intellectual knowledge".  Have you been taking Dave Buchanan lessons again?  
> 
> 
> “It was classic William James, imbued with a sense of the relativism of all knowledge, a respect for and curiosity about alternative perspectives, an instinct to analyze clearly and thoroughly but to develop a synthesis wherever possible, and a conviction that the truth of any idea or thing is best understood by observing its action in the world.
> 
> 
> Marsha 
> 
> ___
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html