[MD] Taking Words Seriously
MarshaV
valkyr at att.net
Mon Sep 5 06:34:58 PDT 2011
Hello Ron,
Do you have quotes to support your accusation? No. Than shut your hole!
The quote below is RMP's, not mine.
Marsha
On Sep 5, 2011, at 9:26 AM, X Acto wrote:
> When you are a silly person who thinks cognition is a trap
> and a cage to escape from.
>
> In which case all this baiting you are doing designed
> for you to loudly proclaim your beliefs is only a trap
> a cage for your mind.
>
> I think that is a "reasonable" conclusion.
>
>
>
> ..
> From: MarshaV <valkyr at att.net>
> To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
> Sent: Monday, September 5, 2011 8:56 AM
> Subject: Re: [MD] Taking Words Seriously
>
>
> DVD: The MOQ at Oxford
> Section: Church of Reason
> Approx. time: 01:30:00
>
>
>
>
>
> Questioner: This idea of reason and rationality as a cage in itself; in what sense can it be a cage?
>
>
>
> RMP: The cage itself is a definition. The definition is a cage. --- Latin phrase --- It's an old Aristotelian construction. You set limits on what a word is. You set limits on what your experience is. And those limits which you set, in order that you can manipulate these words correctly, are also a cage for that word; they can't go beyond it one way or another. One of the reasons we don't define Quality is because if we do we cage it and if you don't define it then all of a sudden the Quality spreads out all over the Universe, sort of speak.
>
> ___
>
___
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list