[MD] Taking Words Seriously

[Joseph Maurer]

Hi Matt and all,

The distinction between Physics and Metaphysics!  When I made that comment I
was focused on the concept "DQ is indefinable".

How can you communicate in defined the terms validity of the understandable-
indefinable in any terms beside poetic analogy.  I saw the "laundry list" as
an assumption that poetry, which is not viewed as a "laundry list", is not
necessary for philosophy DQ/SQ.

Imho the groundwork for the discussion of such poetry, the description
evolution, has not been fully explored beyond the statement "I know the
indefinable."  To lay a groundwork for the "laundry list" demands the
distinction be highlighted between analogous poetic Metaphysics DQ/SQ and
defined logic Physics SQ mathematics in these modern times.

I was only raising a red flag, I did not fire the canon.  IMHO evolution is
levels in existence.

Joe 


On 9/5/11 4:10 PM, "Matt Kundert" <pirsigaffliction at hotmail.com> wrote:

> (This distinction between DQ and "DQ" may perhaps catch Joe's
> distinction between the "metaphysical description DQ/SQ" and what
> he took to my abandonment of it in favor of the "laundry list."  I
> hope this and what follows suggests why I do not take the issue of
> abandonment to even arise.)