[MD] logically incoherent
Joseph Maurer
jhmau at comcast.net
Tue Sep 6 15:10:42 PDT 2011
Hi Ham and All,
"Nothing can exist--in the absence of a Primary Source." How does a Primary
Source exist logically. It can't, logic falters. Communication based in
logic is abandoned. DQ/SQ metaphysics is important in that it embraces DQ,
an indefinable, not non-existent, element in logic. Imho DQ/SQ, metaphysics
is primary to logic.
On 9/5/11 10:10 PM, "Ham Priday" <hampday1 at verizon.net> wrote:
> NOTHING can exist -- not Evolution or its "levels", not the material
> universe, not Quality or the emotions, not Intellect or Experience, not even
> the conscious Self -- in the absence of a Primary Source. I cite as my
> logic for this premise the 'ex nihilo nihil fit' proposition of classical
> philosophy, the empirical precept of 'first cause', and the metaphysical
> principle that Heidegger formulated in the question "Why are there beings
> rather than nothing?"
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list