[MD] logically incoherent

Joseph Maurer jhmau at comcast.net
Tue Sep 6 15:10:42 PDT 2011


Hi Ham and All,

"Nothing can exist--in the absence of a Primary Source."  How does a Primary
Source exist logically.  It can't, logic falters.  Communication based in
logic is abandoned.  DQ/SQ metaphysics is important in that it embraces DQ,
an indefinable, not non-existent, element in logic.  Imho DQ/SQ, metaphysics
is primary to logic.


On 9/5/11 10:10 PM, "Ham Priday" <hampday1 at verizon.net> wrote:

> NOTHING can exist -- not Evolution or its "levels", not the material
> universe, not Quality or the emotions, not Intellect or Experience, not even
> the conscious Self -- in the absence of a Primary Source.  I cite as my
> logic for this premise the 'ex nihilo nihil fit' proposition of classical
> philosophy, the empirical precept of  'first cause', and the metaphysical
> principle that Heidegger formulated in the question "Why are there beings
> rather than nothing?"





More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list