[MD] Nagarjuna and the MOQ
Ham Priday
hampday1 at verizon.net
Sun Sep 18 21:36:03 PDT 2011
Evening, Marsha --
> Will you explain to me what you mean by "conscious locus"?
> Where did your idea of consciousness come from? Why do you
> believe it? Maybe I've been all wrong in thinking the experience
> of "direct awareness" has any relationship to what you are calling
> "conscious locus."
I'll be happy to try, although to me this question is like asking: Please
explain what you mean by "knowing".
I'm not sure, but I seem to recall that the significance of the word "locus"
in the context of consciousness first struck me in a statement by Platt
(remember him?) some years ago. Platt was not primarily interested in
metaphysics, but he said something to the effect that "we are the locus of
our reality," which is not only true but descriptive of the self. He
referred me to Donald Hoffman, a cognitivc scientist who also happens to be
a subjectivist. Subjectivism is the view that accords primacy to subjective
experience as fundamental to all measure and law. Sometimes confused with
Solipsism, it holds that the nature and existence of every object depends
solely on someone's subjective awareness of it.
Since this may be a new concept to you, here's a précis of what Wikipedia
has to say about it:
"Metaphysical subjectivism is the theory that reality is what we perceive to
be real, and that there is no underlying true reality that exists
independently of perception. One can also hold that it is consciousness
rather than perception that is reality (subjective idealism). This is in
contrast to metaphysical objectivism and philosophical realism, which assert
that there is an underlying 'objective' reality which is perceived in
different ways.
"This viewpoint should not be confused with the stance that 'all is
illusion' or that 'there is no such thing as reality.' Metaphysical
subjectivists hold that reality is real enough. They conceive, however,
that the nature of reality as related to a given consciousness is dependent
on that consciousness. This has its philosophical basis in the writings of
Descartes (cogito ergo sum), and forms a cornerstone of Søren Kierkegaard's
philosophy."
I included the following Donald Hoffman quote in my book (p.37), which
should give you the general idea subjectivists are espousing:
"I believe that consciousness and its contents are all that exists.
Space-time, matter and fields never were the fundamental denizens of the
universe, but have always been, from the beginning, among the humbler
contents of consciousness, dependent on it for their very being. The world
of our daily experience - the world of tables, chairs, stars and people,
with their attendant shapes, smells, feels and sounds - is a
species-specific user interface to a realm far more complex, a realm whose
essential character is conscious. ...If this be right, if consciousness is
fundamental, then we should not be surprised that, despite centuries of
effort by the most brilliant minds, there is as yet no physical theory of
consciousness, no theory that explains how mindless matter and energy or
fields could be, or cause, conscious experience." --[D.A. Hoffman, Visual
Intelligence]
Now, I'm an Essentialist, not a subjectivist; but anyone in search of an
alternative to S/O duality, in the Western tradition at least, would do well
to consider this "philosophy of mind" before forming a metaphysical
conclusion. Whatever "else exists" out there amounts to nothing unless
there is subjective awareness of it. This is as true in Essentialism as it
is in Qualityism or any other metaphysical ontology.
So to answer your question, Marsha, I would say that subjective awareness --
whether you call it consciousness, sensibility, or simply 'knowing' -- is
primary to existential reality. And it only occurs in the individuated
state of 'being-aware'. (I'm sure you will find corollaries of this concept
in the doctrines of Eastern mysticism.)
Thanks for the query. I hope I've satisfied your curiosity.
In support of the subjective Self,
Ham
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list