[MD] Nagarjuna and the MOQ

[ARLO J BENSINGER JR]

[Ham]
Feel free to explore the archives for additional Ham comments...

[Arlo]
I've no need, your insincere statement about not being "totally antagonistic"
to Pirsig's thesis was easily refuted. Going back even further I've found not
one single post that could be construed as supportive of Pirsig's MOQ in any
conceivable way. 

You want to play the 'renegade dissenter', that is your own business. Horse
allows you here, and I have no problem with that. My comments were only that I
can not fathom why anyone would join a forum dedicated to discussing an idea
they reject. 

You reject Quality is fundamental, you reject the MOQ hierarchy, you whine
incessently about Pirsig's rejection of "proprietary awareness", you call his
works "euphamistic not metaphysic", incomprehensible and incomplete. 

And yet you are still here. And you are here not to discuss Pirsig, but to
promote "Essentialism", which is what you do in every post, in response to any
topic, and at every turn. 

I can assure you it was no "painstaking" task to put together that list, it
took a whole of three minutes. And your complaints about my not being "fair"
are empty, as you yourself know you could not find one single example of a post
that is supportive of Pirsig and not proselytizing Essentialism. 

You want to paint this as "dissent", knock yourself out 'cowboy'. But don't
pretend for a minute you are here to talk about Pirsig, except to reject his
ideas and soapbox 'Essentialism'.