[MD] Indeterminism

[Dan Glover]

Hello everyone

On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 6:13 AM, X Acto <xacto at rocketmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> And some of our posters hold some very rigid conceptions about "conventional" terms. They
> reject those terms on purely metaphysical reasons not Pragmatic ones.
>
> It's the attitude that must be rejected freinds .. the dynamism lies in looking at each static
> composite with fresh eyes, to see the new in the old, to expand understanding.
>
> And on this note, to Dan, perhaps the rejection of social quality and the measuring of your
> writing agaist the satisfaction it delivers to you has become a rigid static pattern of "good"
> for you and perhaps breaking those static patterns would be a real boon to your writing.
> Just a suggestion.

Hi Ron

I'm not sure what you mean... are you suggesting writing gives me some
sort of satisfaction?

I thought I made it clear that it doesn't. I don't "want" to write so
much as I am compelled to write.

Are you suggesting I should pander to others and thereby measure my writing?

But I don't "measure" my writing at all.

I just write. If it is good, fine. If it is not, then it is not. And I
do know the difference... it isn't the measure of my writing that
makes it good or not... it is the writing itself.

I'm not rejecting social quality. I envy those who find value in
social quality. But to me, it rings false. There are times when I wish
it didn't.

>
> peace

and to you,

Dan