[MD] Awareness and consciousness in the MOQ

[Joseph Maurer]

Hi Andre and All.

I don't know your take on evolution.  MOQ indefinable DQ definable SQ
creates a framework for thought.  Both exist.

The indefinable is not non existent! There are some thoughts for evolution
which are beyond logic like inorganic and organic existence which requires a
change in metaphysics.

Metaphysics provides the template for common use so that we are not just
flapping our lips.  DQ is indefinable.  For myself when I see DQ I
immediately go to the emotional bag and pull something out.  That is the
value of MOQ. We have something to talk about even though emotions are
indefinable.  

It becomes even more interesting when I read that reality is grouped in a
hierarchy, evolution.  What is the model?  For many years it was SOM.  SOM
placed definition before reality and could not answer some questions:  What
is evolution?  Levels in existence!

Joe  


On 4/7/12 9:26 AM, "Andre" <andrebroersen at gmail.com> wrote:

> Andre:
> Not sure if you read my post to Ron, but I do not think that words 'are
> ruining the ultimately undefined nature of reality'. The Buddha rests
> just as comfortably in the gears of a motorcycle as in the words of a
> text. I prefer the use of the term 'partial'. I mean, if words are
> ruining everything then we may as well stop talking altogether, in the
> same way that if certain posters consider sq to be an illusion then we
> may as well stop living. I mean it just nullifies everything. As if,
> indeed everything in the universe can be described by the twenty-six
> written characters. Not on.