[MD] The Future of the MOQ

[Joseph Maurer]

Hi Tuukka and All,

Mathematics is a formal language, definable terms only for logic.  MOQ
metaphysics supports logic in discussing indefinable/definable reality
DQ/SQ.  

Rigid logic in mathematics does not configure evolution it accepts
evolution described by metaphysics.  1 is created, not evolved from 0.
Division by 0 produces an error message.  Mathematics does not logically
validate conceptualized, indefinable/definable levels in existence,
evolution.  DQ/SQ metaphysics stand alone.   MOQ accepts evolution and looks
beyond mathematical logic to metaphysics and value in a defined SQ,
indefinable DQ description of reality.

Mathematics, uses the metaphysical concept of defined 0ne, rigorous logic.
There is no mathematics of creation before SQ 1.  Metaphysical logic MOQ
accepts the indefinable DQ.  Math logic accepts reality from the
metaphysical concept which describes an existing indefinable base DQ
becoming 1 SQ, in evolution.

Joe 


On 4/12/12 4:59 PM, "Tuukka Virtaperko" <mail at tuukkavirtaperko.net> wrote:

> Maybe you don't want the academia to get its dirty hands on the MOQ, so
> they wouldn't ruin it. Like they ruined the Pythagorean theorem. Except
> that theorem has not changed one bit for millenia. It hasn't changed,
> because it's mathematics. It's based on a formal language, which makes
> it possible to communicate unambiguously.