[MD] A problem with the MOQ.

Joseph Maurer jhmau at comcast.net
Mon Apr 30 13:18:58 PDT 2012


Hi Ham and All,

I don't trust your statement that there are two entities to be accounted
for.  

A conception of evolution as inorganic, organic1 (replication by a single
cell splitting itself), organic 2 (replication by the penetration of an egg
cell by a sperm cell) etc., suggests a finite number of evolutionary levels
to be accounted for, not just Essence and not-Essence.

Existence, not-existence doesn't account for evolution.  Levels in existence
opens the metaphysical door to evolution.

Joe


On 4/29/12 7:55 PM, "Ham Priday" <hampday1 at verizon.net> wrote:

> Since existence is a relational dichotomy, there are two entities to be
> accounted for:





More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list