[MD] A problem with the MOQ.
Joseph Maurer
jhmau at comcast.net
Mon Apr 30 13:18:58 PDT 2012
Hi Ham and All,
I don't trust your statement that there are two entities to be accounted
for.
A conception of evolution as inorganic, organic1 (replication by a single
cell splitting itself), organic 2 (replication by the penetration of an egg
cell by a sperm cell) etc., suggests a finite number of evolutionary levels
to be accounted for, not just Essence and not-Essence.
Existence, not-existence doesn't account for evolution. Levels in existence
opens the metaphysical door to evolution.
Joe
On 4/29/12 7:55 PM, "Ham Priday" <hampday1 at verizon.net> wrote:
> Since existence is a relational dichotomy, there are two entities to be
> accounted for:
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list