[MD] humpty dumpty

[118]

Well, it is even easier than that!  The intellectual cannot define itself.  A finger cannot point to itself.  No need for weasel words like "cages".  Those are just misleading, like something is actually being said.  The cage of "the cages" is simply wrong, and somewhat ridiculous.

Sent laboriously from an iPhone,
Mark

On Aug 2, 2012, at 12:13 PM, david buchanan <dmbuchanan at hotmail.com> wrote:

> 
> Andre said to dmb & Marsha:
> 
> Marsha, you have denied this in the past and keep on denying having received the explanations and contextual evidence of your anti-intellectualism dmb has provided. In fact, I have provided very similar retorts to you as well... These explanations provided and contextual evidence given date back to at least 2010. My suggestion therefore is to go to the archives where you will find what you so vehemently deny. And please, do not expect either dmb or myself to drag it up yet again and confront you with all the evidence.
> 
> 
> dmb says:
> It's even easier than that, actually. If Marsha sincerely wants to know what "intellectual" and "anti-intellectual" means, she could simply read my recent posts in this thread. I explained where I saw "anti-intellectualism" to Dan in detail and provided quotes from both of Pirsig's books to lay out what "intellect" means in the MOQ. Marsha's denial is not just obviously false. It's conspicuously ridiculous, shamelessly audacious and anyone with a nose can smell the bullshit.
> 
> 
>                         
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html