[MD] humpty dumpty

[Jan Anders Andersson]

Mark

Thanks for your answer. Sorry about your father.

I have just one more question to this:

9 aug 2012 kl. 07.20 wrote 118:

>  I am afraid that Pirsig's
> grasp of evolution is rather rudimentary.  In fact, as I recall he
> dismisses the discipline of Science as futile since it creates more
> questions than it answers.  Therefore the manner in which Pirsig uses
> the term "evolution" must be taken in context.   I provide "reports"
> with every post I deliver.  Perhaps I am the writer from abroad
> "somewhere in Qualityland" reporting from the embassy.  I simply tell
> others what it is like to live in the realm of Quality.  Perhaps my
> words and examples are different from Pirsig's, but they are
> completely consistent.  Trust me.
> 
> I commend you for "exploring" alternatives.  I, for one, am all for
> that.  Just be careful since there are many in this forum that will be
> calling you names before long.  I have no need to build a new MOQ from
> scratch.  Everything I present is consistent with Pirsig.  At least
> nobody has said anything to the contrary (except call me names).  If
> you pay attention to WHY Pirsig writes what he does, rather than what
> he writes, you will get a better idea of Quality.  He presents a
> metaphysics from the viewpoint of Quality.  This is exactly what I am
> doing (believe it or not).

The subtitle of Lila is "An Inquiry into Morals". What is your picture of these "Morals", are, for example, the Periodic table an illusion or what?

regards

Jan Anders