[MD] : Re: It's all an analogy. Does this change anything?

[MarshaV]

Andre,

I am talking about weakly experienced (insignificant) value as opposed to strongly experienced value.  It might have been a poor choice to use 'low value', or maybe not, either way I explained quite clearly I meant insignificant.  If a scale of significant/insignificant doesn't interest you, that is fine.  


Marsha
 


On Aug 12, 2012, at 4:00 PM, Andre Broersen <andrebroersen at gmail.com> wrote:

> Marsha said to Dave: Maybe like the Europeans, who came to this
> country, you devalue and bully everyone who doesn't think and speak
> like you?
> 
> Andre:
> Are you native American Indian Marsha?
> 
> Marsha`;
> This is a psychological question not a philosophical question.  I
> already explained that 'low value' represent insignificance, not bad.
> 
> Andre:
> This is bull Marsha...and I hope you know it. You are the one calling
> the shots all the time...as you wriggle out of everything you claim.
> Now listen: low quality does NOT mean ' insignificant'.
> Not here on this MoQ discuss. Is sitting on a hot stove insignificant
> to you? Is the experience of the amoeba after the sulfuric acid is
> placed in its environment an insignificant event for the amoeba?
> 
> Stop creating your own little meanings and interpretations on normal
> MoQ language as we have come to know and apply them from LILA.
> 
> Without that we simply cannot communicate reasonably and
> comprehendingly with each other. And in this context I stick with my
> guns: I believe you are not interested in comprehending, understanding
> nor even communicating properly with each other. You think you are
> sooooo....
> 
> You probably think this MoQ is about you don't don't you???
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html