[MD] It's all an analogy. Does this change anything?

[David Harding]

Hello Mark,

> Perhaps a question to you is appropriate.  Why do you say that a truth is an intellectual pattern?
> 
> Is this simply how you define truth, or are you trying to say something substantive?  I would like your considered opinion on this since I believe you are mistaken.  This is especially true if you consider your statement to be truth.
> 
> How about answering a question for a change?  I feel you have no idea what you are talking about.  All this badgering of Marsha to prove a point is pointless.

It's not pointless.  There is great value in truth.  It has produced some amazing things in our world today and if you care to look it is actually unavoidable.  

Mysticism of the variety which Marsha and yourself talk however, *is* pointless on this philosophical discussion board.  You just constantly point towards Dynamic Quality and shield yourself in that non-definition avoiding any real philosophical confrontation.

I, on the other hand, value things like metaphysics, truths, reason and logic.   I think the MOQ is a good Metaphysics.   Metaphysics, by definition, is a philosophical truth.   It strikes me as incredibly anti-MOQ if one was to claim they don't value truth.

-David.