[MD] DQ and SQ interrelationship

[118]

Heh, heh,
You guys are amusing!

Carry on, I hope you find what you are looking for.  It sure ain't Quality.  Pity that Pirsig can not get through to you, but not surprising.

Me?  I am the outsider, wondering why you are making such a fuss about what I write.  Perhaps deep down it makes you uncomfortable.  Your perfect little reality is like a ship on the ocean.  Perhaps you should check below deck to make sure you are not taking on water.

Cheers,


Mark

On Aug 17, 2012, at 8:54 PM, X Acto <xacto at rocketmail.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> [Ron to Mark]
> This makes you come off like a pompus egotistical ass that has really not took the time to carefully read the material. This indeed raises the hackles of those of us who have done the reading.
> 
> [Arlo]
> My advice, put Mark on ignore. His posts follow the same script, whether its you or Ant or Horse or anyone. Whether or not he is trolling or has really come to think of himself as some sort of messiah in a den of swine matters little, best thing you can do is walk away, he offers nothing of substance. And I can guarantee if he responds to me here, it will be in the same script. Put his posts side-by-side, they are all the same and you'll see the formula.
> 
> [Ron)
> It just strikes me as odd that someone who is that bad at 
> explanation could be a competent or "good" scientist,
>  I mean, isnt that part of the job description?
> 
> aaaah you are probably right. 
> 
> Time to pop the cap on a Rouge "double dead guy" and just forget it.
> 
> ..
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html