[MD] It's all an analogy. Does this change anything?

[MarshaV]

Hello David,

On Aug 17, 2012, at 11:52 PM, David Harding <davidjharding at gmail.com> wrote:

>> Or does a pattern represent a generalized accumulation of repetitive, artificially isolated experiences, that are somewhat similar and which consciousness interactively reconstructs into particulars?
> 
> I agree with that except for the term artificial.   Patterns are not artificial any more than eating an orange in the morning is artificial.    Here's a sarcastic suggestion - why not rename Dynamic Quality - Real Quality and static quality - artificial quality.   Aren't they such better terms!?!

I did not state that patterns were artificial; I wrote the process of isolating events from their interdependencies was artificial (artificially isolating experiences).  And thus ends this circular dirge. If you would like to use the word 'truth' please do so; if you think differently than I, that is fine with me too.  I have no interest in continuing.   

Thank you.

Marsha