[MD] Good Mystic, Bad Mystic.

David Harding davidjharding at gmail.com
Mon Aug 20 06:08:02 PDT 2012


Hi Ian,

Nice to hear from you.

> David, you said summing up towards the end ...
> 
> "Alternatively, a good mystic knows intimately that they pollute the
> world with the karma of metaphysical truths and that these truths and
> karma are *not* Dynamic Quality."
> 
> I didn't see how that *not* follows from your argument ?
> Ian

How do you not see? To be honest, I can't see how your confused... Can you elaborate why you're confused? I'll go further if it helps..

A good mystic knows that they pollute the world with metaphysical ideas and truths.  A good mystic knows what DQ is not, so they know what DQ is.  A good mystic knows that every thing is not DQ because every thing is some such a static quality.  A good mystic knows that eventually everything gets old and bad and becomes a problem for someone to have to deal with.  Even the MOQ will one day be replaced by something better. That is, the MOQ will be a problem.. For some, it's a problem now :-)

Alternatively, a bad mystic denies they pollute the world with metaphysical garbage.  A bad mystic claims that all sq is DQ and so subsequently knows neither.  As a bad mystic knows neither sq or DQ, they subsequently don't know how to deal with their problems - or with the world.

-David.


More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list