[MD] Good Mystic, Bad Mystic.
David Harding
davidjharding at gmail.com
Mon Aug 20 06:08:02 PDT 2012
Hi Ian,
Nice to hear from you.
> David, you said summing up towards the end ...
>
> "Alternatively, a good mystic knows intimately that they pollute the
> world with the karma of metaphysical truths and that these truths and
> karma are *not* Dynamic Quality."
>
> I didn't see how that *not* follows from your argument ?
> Ian
How do you not see? To be honest, I can't see how your confused... Can you elaborate why you're confused? I'll go further if it helps..
A good mystic knows that they pollute the world with metaphysical ideas and truths. A good mystic knows what DQ is not, so they know what DQ is. A good mystic knows that every thing is not DQ because every thing is some such a static quality. A good mystic knows that eventually everything gets old and bad and becomes a problem for someone to have to deal with. Even the MOQ will one day be replaced by something better. That is, the MOQ will be a problem.. For some, it's a problem now :-)
Alternatively, a bad mystic denies they pollute the world with metaphysical garbage. A bad mystic claims that all sq is DQ and so subsequently knows neither. As a bad mystic knows neither sq or DQ, they subsequently don't know how to deal with their problems - or with the world.
-David.
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list