[MD] Good Mystic, Bad Mystic.

[MarshaV]

Hello Joe,

Why would holding static patterns as hypothetical weaken the concept any more than RMP stating:



On Aug 20, 2012, at 3:36 PM, Joseph  Maurer <jhmau at comcast.net> wrote:

> Hi MarshaV and All,
> 
> I have trouble understanding the need for the argument: Understanding static
> (patterned) value as hypothetical in order to make room for additional
> inquiry.  Imho, That would seriously weaken the metaphysical logic for
> evolution.
> 
> Joe
> 
> 
> On 8/20/12 7:16 AM, "MarshaV" <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
> 
>> Understanding static (patterned) value as hypothetical acknowledges the
>> incompleteness of what we know and makes room for additional inquiry with new
>> possibilities; it promotes an attitude of fearless curiosity: gumption.  It
>> moves one away from thinking of entities as existing inherently and existing
>> independent of consciousness.
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html