[MD] Good Mystic, Bad Mystic.

[MarshaV]

Hi Joe,

Yes, leaving behind, or letting them drop away, is another way of separating from Love and Hate.  They might be witnessed and then let go least they to turn to arrogance.  The MoQ represents, to me, Value (unpatterned/patterned) - all meaningful. 
 

Marsha



On Aug 24, 2012, at 2:00 PM, Joseph  Maurer <jhmau at comcast.net> wrote:

> Hi MarshaV, and All,
> 
> I see Love and Hate as indefinable DQ.  Since they are experienced I leave
> them at the indefinable emotional level.  DQ/SQ is reality therefore
> meaningful.
> 
> Joe
> 
> 
> On 8/23/12 4:15 PM, "MarshaV" <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Hello Joe,
>> 
>> It seems to me, in light of your question, that you are treating love and hate
>> as abstracted intellectual patterns of value.  That might be a way to separate
>> such emotions from experience, separated from experience in the present.
>> 
>> 
>> Marsha 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Aug 23, 2012, at 3:10 PM, Joseph  Maurer <jhmau at comcast.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi MarshaV and All:
>>> 
>>> I am curious how do you separate emotions from the experience of Quality?
>>> Love/Hate are not separated by negation.  Love. Not love! Hate. Not hate!
>>> 
>>> Joe 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 8/23/12 12:42 AM, "MarshaV" <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>> Dynamic Quality is not divisible, not definable and not knowable, though it
>>>>> can be experienced.
>>> 
>>>