[MD] pragmatic
MarshaV
valkyr at att.net
Wed Aug 29 00:54:38 PDT 2012
Greetings,
I don't see RMP's agreement with William James any more than an agreement that patterns continue to exist because of their usefulness. I certainly agree with that. I do not think using RMP's term 'patterns' denigrates their usefulness, nor does considering patterns as hypothetical (supposed but not neccesarily real or true). You might consider that fallibilism is compatible with the pragmatists.
Marsha
,
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list