[MD] Good Mystic, Bad Mystic.

David Harding davidjharding at gmail.com
Wed Aug 29 14:47:55 PDT 2012


Hi dmb,

> 
> david harding said:
> .., the MOQ is intellectual mysticism and it is completely aware of the contradiction in terms when it claims as such.  This is where the MOQ differs from mysticism.  It fully acknowledges the degenerativism yet intellectual value in ruining the undefined source of all things by claiming as such.
> 
> 
> dmb says:
> The MOQ is a big coherent set of intellectual static patterns, a system of words, concepts and definitions. But Quality itself is left undefined. It is the central point around which all these patterns revolve, but this mystic reality is only referred to or pointed at. But there is nothing degenerate about defining those definable words or conceptualizing the MOQ's concepts. In fact, when discussing metaphysics, failing to define the terms and properly conceptualize the concepts would be degenerate or, at best, incompetent.  		 	   		 

Thats right.  A metaphysics is mystically degenerate yet intellectually very valuable.

-David.




More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list