[MD] The first cut.

[MarshaV]

David,

On Feb 1, 2012, at 4:30 AM, David Harding <davidjharding at gmail.com> wrote:

>> 
>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> Mark:
>>>>> There is a format to
>>>>> this after all, unless you create your own rules about metaphysics
>>>>> (which of course you are free to do).  It would be good, however, if
>>>>> we stick to the formal presentation of Metaphysics so that we do not
>>>>> confuse others, imo.
>>>> 
>>>> Marsha:
>>>> I would be most grateful if you would present what you take to be "the
>>>> formal presentation of Metaphysics" with the proper "format" and proper
>>>> "rules"?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Mark:
>>> Well, honestly I am not a formal philosopher, so your question on the
>>> rules of metaphysics in Western terms would be better asked of
>>> another.
>> 
>> 
>> Marsha:
>> And your original comment is just more of you presenting yourself as a know-it-all, baloney vender.
>> 

> 
> David Harding:
> Mark clearly just wants to understand what you're writing. Why do you
> just ignore his questions and attack his personality?
> 

Marsha:
Then he should try reading.  For instance, the paper that I recently posted was on 'direct experience' not Wittgenstein, yet he asked "Perhaps you could explain how Wittgenstein views are related to MoQ?"  And the above exchange makes me think he has an agenda different than trying to understand what I'm posting.


Marsha